Is Morality Intrinsical : Determinism And Deontology

                  Deontology vs Consequencialism

Deontological philosophy outweighs consequencial philosophy due to chaos theory.

Deontology suggests that the moral justification of an act should be determined by the act itself, not its consequences.

Consequential belief states that the ethics and morality of an act should be measured by its outcomes but one outcome may lead to another as stated by the butterfly effect, in turn creating a number of good and bad outcomes again and again indefinitely, hence no consequence could ideally be settled upon.

.               Butterfly effect : The Lorenz Attractor

At the same time the universe being an isolated deterministic system, free will becomes a determined resultant of causalities

although paradoxical but when distinguished dimensionally it makes sense:

Free will is a 4 Dimensional concept that exists in 3 Dimensions. 

While determinism is a complete 4 dimensional idea.

Free Will is Determinism (4D) seen from 3 Dimensions. Hence the probabilities and possibilities appear free but in a continuous chosen timeline, with all of its cause and effects, free will can perfectly fall under deterministic constraints.

Determinism computationalizes causality and it's resulting effects while free will is the computation itself.

Now with the given Free Will, its moral judgement isn't a fundamental nature.

Good and Evil exist only a perspectives towards an act that can change depending upon the justification and motivation of the perceiver. 

For example the murder of a man may be tragic for his family but beneficial for the employer of the murder. 

Morality then filters down from being a constitutional belief ideal to a matter of self idealistic compatibility.

Then why have a moral justification in the first place? What purpose does it serve more than giving an act a rational understanding and justification for emotional attachment?

Absolutely nothing.

Although rational understanding and associated emotions are essential for a functioning individual and hence a functioning civilization, but at the same time there exists no supreme judgement of an act fundamentally unless a constraint of collective good and evil is added.